What is the history behind Oxygen therapy?

Published: 03rd January 2012
Views: N/A

The history of putting oxygen concentrator-releasing substances into the body follows several tracks. Interest in ozone dates back to oxygen concentrators the mid-1800s in Germany, where it was claimed to purify blood. During World War I, doctors used ozone portable oxygen concentrator to treat wounds, trench foot, and the effects of poison gas. In the 1920s, ozone and hydrogen peroxide oxygen machine were used experimentally to treat the flu.

One of the earliest oxygen concentrator accounts of the medical use of hydrogen peroxide was a short article by I.N. Love, MD, concentrator oxygen in 1888 in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Dr. Love described one case in which he home oxygen concentrator felt hydrogen peroxide had been useful in removing pus from the nose and throat of a child with diphtheria, and also recommended using hydrogen peroxide for "cancer of the womb…oxygen concentrator portable as a cleanser, deodorizer, and stimulator of healing." Unlike most current articles in that prestigious journal, the 1888 report did not include details that would be required today,home oxygen machine such as whether patients treated with peroxide lived longer than those receiving placebo, or even whether there was any evidence that peroxide caused cancers of the womb to shrink or disappear. In 1920, hydrogen peroxide injections were used to treat patients during an epidemic of viral pneumonia.

In 1919, William F. Koch, MD, a Detroit physician,3L oxygen concentrator proposed that cancer was caused by a single toxin and that the disease could be prevented or reversed by removing that toxin. To achieve this goal, Dr. Koch 5L oxygen concentrator claimed he had developed glyoxylide, an oxygen compound that could be injected into patients’medical oxygen concentrator muscles. Dr. Koch and his followers claimed that glyoxylide forced cancer cells to absorb oxygen concentrator price, which helped to rid the body of the cancer-causing toxin. In 1942, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) charged Dr. Koch with making false claims about glyoxylide. The courts upheld the accusations, and in 1963 the California Cancer Advisory Council oxygen concentrator reported that glyoxylide therapy had "no value in the diagnosis, treatment, alleviation, or cure of cancer." Later researchers were unable to confirm that glyoxylide ever existed, and studies by theoretical physical chemists oxygen concentrators showed that the chemical structure that Koch claimed to be glyoxylide cannot possibly exist. (Even so, a number of alternative medicine Web sites still promote glyoxylide as a cancer cure.)

During the 1930s, o2 concentrator Otto Warburg, MD, a winner of the Nobel Prize in 1931 for his research on respiratory enzymes, discovered that cancer cells have a lower respiration rate than normal cells. He reasoned that cancer cells thrived in a low-oxygen environment oxigen concentrator and that increased oxygen levels might therefore harm and even kill them. Many of the beliefs held by oxygen therapy practitioners are based on Dr. Warburg’s theories concerning cancer, even though technical advances have since offered a great deal more information about how cancer cells really use oxygen. Even if more oxygen is available, it does not cause the cancer cell to switch back to normal oxygen use. And, a higher oxygen level does not seem to hurt cancer cells any more than it hurts healthy cells.

Much of the more recent use of hydrogen peroxide can be traced to Father Richard Wilhelm, a retired high school teacher and former Army chaplain. He claimed to have discovered the healing potential of hydrogen peroxide through acquaintance with a doctor who headed the Mayo Clinic's division of experimental bacteriology, Edward Carl Rosenow, MD. Wilhelm promoted drinking hydrogen peroxide for a host of human ailments.

What is the evidence?

Available scientific evidence does not support claims that increasing oxygen levels in the body will harm or kill cancer cells. It is difficult to get the oxygen level around the cancer OXYGEN PORTABLE CONCENTRATOR cells in the middle of a tumor higher because the blood supply tends to be poor. But there are differences in the way cancer cells use oxygen that may allow new treatments to better target cancer cells.

According to Dr. Stephen Barrett, who writes about health fraud, a researcher from the Dominican Republic claimed that his clinic had used ozone gas to cure thirteen people with cancer. An investigative news group later learned that two of the patients had died of cancer, three could not be found, two refused to be interviewed, three were alive but still had cancer, and in three cases it was not clear that the patients had actually ever had cancer.

Some researchers have studied hydrogen peroxide as an addition to radiation therapy. Although some patients appeared to benefit, many did not. Some laboratory tests have looked at the combined effects of hydrogen peroxide and certain chemotherapy portable oxygen concentrator 5L drugs against cancer cells, but it is still too early to tell if this will be of any benefit. According to a review article in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, attempts to treat patients by injecting hydrogen peroxide directly into solid tumors or into the blood system have generally been ineffective. In one study, mice were injected with glucose oxidase (an enzyme that breaks down glucose, with one of the byproducts being hydrogen peroxide) bound to microspheres, a technique that caused hydrogen peroxide to be released directly at the tumor site. Mice that received injections lived longer than those that did not. The researchers in this study concluded that more research on the use of hydrogen peroxide with other anti-tumor drugs was needed.

In one 2008 study, portable oxygen concentrator some tumors in rabbits disappeared without any treatment, but more disappeared after treatment with ordinary oxygen, and even more disappeared after ozone treatment. In this study, the oxygen and ozone were injected into the rabbits' abdomens (peritoneal space). However, the relevance of such tumors to cancer in humans remains unproven.

A 2001 review of ozone therapy oxygen concentrator concluded that "… few rigorous clinical trials of the treatment exist. Those that oxygen concentrators have been published demonstrated no evidence of effect… Until more positive evidence emerges,oxygen machine ozone therapy should be avoided."

Report this article Ask About This Article

More to Explore